<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CD Review &#8211; Good Evening New York City marred by auto-tune</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.retroblog.net/2009/11/20/cd-review-good-evening-new-york-city-marred-by-auto-tune/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.retroblog.net/2009/11/20/cd-review-good-evening-new-york-city-marred-by-auto-tune/</link>
	<description>I&#039;m living in the past...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:24:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.retroblog.net/2009/11/20/cd-review-good-evening-new-york-city-marred-by-auto-tune/comment-page-1/#comment-9595</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retroblog.net/?p=1980#comment-9595</guid>
		<description>Just saw Paul in Charlotte and they are definitely messing with his vocals live (and the backing vocals as well).  You can just tell - particularly on &quot;softer&quot; songs like &quot;Long and Winding Road&quot; etc.  You can even tell by Paul&#039;s face, and how he approaches singing a &quot;corrected&quot; song.  He sort of pulls back from the mic, and has a strange expression at times.  I last saw him in 1990 and he sounded better and less pitchy now, which is of course extremely unlikely.  Not making a judgement, just stating an observation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just saw Paul in Charlotte and they are definitely messing with his vocals live (and the backing vocals as well).  You can just tell &#8211; particularly on &#8220;softer&#8221; songs like &#8220;Long and Winding Road&#8221; etc.  You can even tell by Paul&#8217;s face, and how he approaches singing a &#8220;corrected&#8221; song.  He sort of pulls back from the mic, and has a strange expression at times.  I last saw him in 1990 and he sounded better and less pitchy now, which is of course extremely unlikely.  Not making a judgement, just stating an observation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.retroblog.net/2009/11/20/cd-review-good-evening-new-york-city-marred-by-auto-tune/comment-page-1/#comment-7334</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retroblog.net/?p=1980#comment-7334</guid>
		<description>aw and the auto tune is very very obvious, its undebatable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aw and the auto tune is very very obvious, its undebatable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.retroblog.net/2009/11/20/cd-review-good-evening-new-york-city-marred-by-auto-tune/comment-page-1/#comment-7332</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retroblog.net/?p=1980#comment-7332</guid>
		<description>So true, most noticeable on &quot;Here Today&quot;, a beautiful song kind of ruined.. saw him live too Mike, he was brilliant but that&#039;s the whole experience. Wasn&#039;t him fucked up with the autotune anyway, just some modern studio tech messing about trying to make it perfect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So true, most noticeable on &#8220;Here Today&#8221;, a beautiful song kind of ruined.. saw him live too Mike, he was brilliant but that&#8217;s the whole experience. Wasn&#8217;t him fucked up with the autotune anyway, just some modern studio tech messing about trying to make it perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.retroblog.net/2009/11/20/cd-review-good-evening-new-york-city-marred-by-auto-tune/comment-page-1/#comment-4873</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 04:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retroblog.net/?p=1980#comment-4873</guid>
		<description>The above link won&#039;t take you to the song, but click on it anyway. In the upper left hand corner of the screen type &quot;band on the run&quot; in the search box.

Jeff, you have some nerve going after me after you viciously personally attacked Rev link because he didn&#039;t agree about auto tune. It&#039;s on the thread announcing the upcoming release of the Citi Field cd. You are a sick man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above link won&#8217;t take you to the song, but click on it anyway. In the upper left hand corner of the screen type &#8220;band on the run&#8221; in the search box.</p>
<p>Jeff, you have some nerve going after me after you viciously personally attacked Rev link because he didn&#8217;t agree about auto tune. It&#8217;s on the thread announcing the upcoming release of the Citi Field cd. You are a sick man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.retroblog.net/2009/11/20/cd-review-good-evening-new-york-city-marred-by-auto-tune/comment-page-1/#comment-4867</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retroblog.net/?p=1980#comment-4867</guid>
		<description>You tube is filled with songs from Halifax and his vocals are fine, just like they are on the Citi field show. Audience members arte holding their own camcorders and he&#039;s right on key.

You want to hear Paul McCartney on autotune? listen to Band on the Run. Someone autotuned the original record and the autotune is obvious. On Citi Field he sounds every bit as real as he does at Halifax, where I&#039;m told there is no autotune.

http://www.ilictronix.com/search/label/band on the run  

Some of the logic written here is insane. I only think it sounds good but it really doesn&#039;t because it&#039;s too loud for me to judge. Concerts wouldn&#039;t exist if everyone thought they liked it but weren&#039;t sure. Also, he typically does about 35 songs per show and each tour will always give us about 18 to 20 songs that will always be played. If he does a tour and omits some of the obvious songs like Yesterday and Let it Be, there will be a lot of pissed off people.

There&#039;s usually about 15+ songs that we don&#039;t usually hear. At Citi Field there were four songs from his most recent works. Unfortunately, people use those songs for bathroom breaks because they came to hear all of the oldies. If I have to go I&#039;ll do so during a familiar old song. People are paying a lot of money for his show and he knows that he has to give them what they paid for.

The genius of the century award goes to Jeff. He figured I&#039;m some neo con who hates others that don&#039;t think like me and then gives himself a pat on the back for thinking he can figure out my politics. Jeff, you aren&#039;t even close and you need to get a life. I will offer you a start: Being that you&#039;re the genius who can read minds and is the know all on auto tune why don&#039;t you do something no other critic here or on other forums has been able to do:
Tell us what songs on the cd have auto tune. But tell us at what time in each song does auto tune kicks in. 

On the link above autotune is obvious. Just as it&#039;s obvious on Cher&#039;s song, &quot;I Believe&quot;. If he was using autotune on the Citi Field cd/dvd his vocals in halifax would suck, and they don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You tube is filled with songs from Halifax and his vocals are fine, just like they are on the Citi field show. Audience members arte holding their own camcorders and he&#8217;s right on key.</p>
<p>You want to hear Paul McCartney on autotune? listen to Band on the Run. Someone autotuned the original record and the autotune is obvious. On Citi Field he sounds every bit as real as he does at Halifax, where I&#8217;m told there is no autotune.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ilictronix.com/search/label/band" rel="nofollow">http://www.ilictronix.com/search/label/band</a> on the run  </p>
<p>Some of the logic written here is insane. I only think it sounds good but it really doesn&#8217;t because it&#8217;s too loud for me to judge. Concerts wouldn&#8217;t exist if everyone thought they liked it but weren&#8217;t sure. Also, he typically does about 35 songs per show and each tour will always give us about 18 to 20 songs that will always be played. If he does a tour and omits some of the obvious songs like Yesterday and Let it Be, there will be a lot of pissed off people.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s usually about 15+ songs that we don&#8217;t usually hear. At Citi Field there were four songs from his most recent works. Unfortunately, people use those songs for bathroom breaks because they came to hear all of the oldies. If I have to go I&#8217;ll do so during a familiar old song. People are paying a lot of money for his show and he knows that he has to give them what they paid for.</p>
<p>The genius of the century award goes to Jeff. He figured I&#8217;m some neo con who hates others that don&#8217;t think like me and then gives himself a pat on the back for thinking he can figure out my politics. Jeff, you aren&#8217;t even close and you need to get a life. I will offer you a start: Being that you&#8217;re the genius who can read minds and is the know all on auto tune why don&#8217;t you do something no other critic here or on other forums has been able to do:<br />
Tell us what songs on the cd have auto tune. But tell us at what time in each song does auto tune kicks in. </p>
<p>On the link above autotune is obvious. Just as it&#8217;s obvious on Cher&#8217;s song, &#8220;I Believe&#8221;. If he was using autotune on the Citi Field cd/dvd his vocals in halifax would suck, and they don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lior</title>
		<link>http://www.retroblog.net/2009/11/20/cd-review-good-evening-new-york-city-marred-by-auto-tune/comment-page-1/#comment-2752</link>
		<dc:creator>Lior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 00:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retroblog.net/?p=1980#comment-2752</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just goggled &quot;Paul McCartney auto tune&quot; to see if anybody else noticed.
I wonder why they used in such an &quot;obvious&quot; way...
There is a way to auto tune good singers without us ever finding out.
I saw him live in Tel Aviv last year and he was great with out any computer assistance.
about the keys presets ,
I object the whole &quot;sax solo on the keyboard&quot; concept,
It just looks stupid and reminds me of wedding bands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just goggled &#8220;Paul McCartney auto tune&#8221; to see if anybody else noticed.<br />
I wonder why they used in such an &#8220;obvious&#8221; way&#8230;<br />
There is a way to auto tune good singers without us ever finding out.<br />
I saw him live in Tel Aviv last year and he was great with out any computer assistance.<br />
about the keys presets ,<br />
I object the whole &#8220;sax solo on the keyboard&#8221; concept,<br />
It just looks stupid and reminds me of wedding bands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul McCartney &#8211; Hey Tokyo &#8211; 1993 &#124; retroblog.net</title>
		<link>http://www.retroblog.net/2009/11/20/cd-review-good-evening-new-york-city-marred-by-auto-tune/comment-page-1/#comment-2465</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul McCartney &#8211; Hey Tokyo &#8211; 1993 &#124; retroblog.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retroblog.net/?p=1980#comment-2465</guid>
		<description>[...] to some old Paul McCartney boots these last few days just to wash the bad aftertaste left from this whole autotune debacle. I&#8217;d rather listen to a pure, un-altered performance of a Macca show than some artificially [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to some old Paul McCartney boots these last few days just to wash the bad aftertaste left from this whole autotune debacle. I&#8217;d rather listen to a pure, un-altered performance of a Macca show than some artificially [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.retroblog.net/2009/11/20/cd-review-good-evening-new-york-city-marred-by-auto-tune/comment-page-1/#comment-2300</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retroblog.net/?p=1980#comment-2300</guid>
		<description>I noticed it on &#039;&#039;Sing the Changes&#039;&#039;! A bit too perfect. I still like Paul though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed it on &#8221;Sing the Changes&#8221;! A bit too perfect. I still like Paul though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Professor</title>
		<link>http://www.retroblog.net/2009/11/20/cd-review-good-evening-new-york-city-marred-by-auto-tune/comment-page-1/#comment-2235</link>
		<dc:creator>The Professor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retroblog.net/?p=1980#comment-2235</guid>
		<description>Wow. I&#039;m not sure what surprises me more. The fact that there are people commenting in this blog that CAN&#039;T hear the pitch correction; that there&#039;s those that would stop and read a blog only to be rude and degrading to the blogger; or that someone actually never saw Star Wars!!

Ok. I was at the Citi concert - no pitch correction live. When I watched the concert on tv last week I actually commented on Macca being MORE in tune than I remember. Then, I could hear all of the artifacts from the software. 

I work as a musician and an engineer and I can guarantee the use of pitch correction in post. It&#039;s horribly blatant as well. What&#039;s funny is that you can use the plugin judiciously and blend it to be hardly noticable. His was obviously a tactic to get the product out quickly.   

I heard even more auto-tune on the Rock &amp; Roll HoF 25th Ann concert. Art Garfunkle sounded like a robot. That&#039;s heartbreaking. 

They do it because he deaf can&#039;t hear it and the dumb buy it. I don&#039;t mean any offense. (I bought it myself) The industry will keep pumping out crap until the people speak out with their cash. 

And, come on… Star Wars?? Really???? That many people can&#039;t be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I&#8217;m not sure what surprises me more. The fact that there are people commenting in this blog that CAN&#8217;T hear the pitch correction; that there&#8217;s those that would stop and read a blog only to be rude and degrading to the blogger; or that someone actually never saw Star Wars!!</p>
<p>Ok. I was at the Citi concert &#8211; no pitch correction live. When I watched the concert on tv last week I actually commented on Macca being MORE in tune than I remember. Then, I could hear all of the artifacts from the software. </p>
<p>I work as a musician and an engineer and I can guarantee the use of pitch correction in post. It&#8217;s horribly blatant as well. What&#8217;s funny is that you can use the plugin judiciously and blend it to be hardly noticable. His was obviously a tactic to get the product out quickly.   </p>
<p>I heard even more auto-tune on the Rock &amp; Roll HoF 25th Ann concert. Art Garfunkle sounded like a robot. That&#8217;s heartbreaking. </p>
<p>They do it because he deaf can&#8217;t hear it and the dumb buy it. I don&#8217;t mean any offense. (I bought it myself) The industry will keep pumping out crap until the people speak out with their cash. </p>
<p>And, come on… Star Wars?? Really???? That many people can&#8217;t be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.retroblog.net/2009/11/20/cd-review-good-evening-new-york-city-marred-by-auto-tune/comment-page-1/#comment-2076</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retroblog.net/?p=1980#comment-2076</guid>
		<description>Bill, 

your comment makes it seem that YOU&#039;RE the one that&#039;s out of touch.

why are you criticizing retroblog when it&#039;s obvious McCartney DID indeed rely on autotune?

I thought retroblog was right on the money with his review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, </p>
<p>your comment makes it seem that YOU&#8217;RE the one that&#8217;s out of touch.</p>
<p>why are you criticizing retroblog when it&#8217;s obvious McCartney DID indeed rely on autotune?</p>
<p>I thought retroblog was right on the money with his review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

